Disclaimer: This blog is intended for open minded Better animals
like us trying to become human and not for animals,better animals and individuals who think they are humans without actually knowing what it is meant to be human . This
information is to open the thinking and not to hurt any individual. If you feel
it is hurting your beliefs please stop reading and close the blog, it’s your
choice; you are welcome to do it.
Intention of this site is to help people go beyond the books that one follows. We are against the books and unwanted traditional beliefs. To be clear we are not against god or Alh.
We are against any book that commanded human killing in the name
of god or holy land or wealth,Most of the books followed are considered to be
most authentic word from higher species. The verses that we sate are direct
commands which cannot be selectively followed by few, it advises all the people
who follow their books.
The whole world fights against monopoly, but
the same people fight to monopolize their book and god. Traditional culture
says everybody is one but these two books tell they are the only one.
There is only one book for these two big sects but why do we have
different emphasis, different interpretations, believes, laws and different
ways of worship. Please do not compare yourself with Indians, they are
polytheists they can have several different versions of beliefs but we should
not.
We think and say that religion will not have bad verses and try to find out reasons and events to support bad verses like killing were included by selfish better organized animals, why not tell that good verses were copied from other countries which did not command killing. Simply stated these book readers simply find reasons to state that the book is really pure and good and to prove and make people believe those reasons, they create false archaeological evidence, literature and stories.If one can see the restricted countries/patriotic right now like Is_ites and Ar_b which is not infiltrated by other country better animals shows how vengeance or fighting is good.
When we face this question we will stress the core remains the same, only few other beliefs are different, my question is why only the core is same? If the book is one everybody should follow only one thing there should be no difference, there should be no different group, following the same books differently. Both books Ble and Kan or Qan narrate different stories about the same person that in itself shows us that the story is flawed and unreliable.
When bad verses are pointed out moderates and innocents who do not
have proper understanding or who cannot think beyond few manipulated things/evidence/reasons
or who have a bias use the technique called “blame Game” which is followed even
today by school children that is when the teacher finds out a kid’s misbehavior
in the class and enquirers about the misbehavior in the class he will point his
fingers to the next kid, further his friend may also point to the other kid
which might not be true; In the same way instead of accepting the faults and
cruelty buried, these, innocent and moderate better animals spread reasons and
events that may not have happened or unrelated to support their point of view.
We think and say that religion will not have bad verses and try to find out reasons and events to support bad verses like killing were included by selfish better organized animals, why not tell that good verses were copied from other countries which did not command killing. Simply stated these book readers simply find reasons to state that the book is really pure and good and to prove and make people believe those reasons, they create false archaeological evidence, literature and stories.If one can see the restricted countries/patriotic right now like Is_ites and Ar_b which is not infiltrated by other country better animals shows how vengeance or fighting is good.
When we face this question we will stress the core remains the same, only few other beliefs are different, my question is why only the core is same? If the book is one everybody should follow only one thing there should be no difference, there should be no different group, following the same books differently. Both books Ble and Kan or Qan narrate different stories about the same person that in itself shows us that the story is flawed and unreliable.
Unlike nearly all of the O’ Test and N’ test
verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Qan or Kan are mostly
open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of
the surrounding text. They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of
Alh and the Lord and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Ble
and Qan or Kan.
Nowadays few psychologists have started to fear the so called holy books, which are being read by millions and millions. The reason they state is that, the most followed books give a slew of good wordings in between which they dictate people to perform cruelty, which have the power to influence more. We as better animals always try to defend something which we have followed for a long time and we try to find reasons that support what we think. It is embedded into our system by our native traditions to respect somebody who has given us the due respect, food and water, though we know it we try to rationalize books containing verses which have commanded human killing with bias and without thinking.
Moderate and innocent religious followers have rarely accepted the cruelty and slavery buried in these books. If the faults are pointed out to people, these innocent people will stand upon 10 verses, I would like to ask them, why should one read the full book? If so, other verses are unnecessary, follower of a book should follow the whole book. As moderates and innocents who have followed the native culture for long, will try to ignore the arrogance but it is still in the book that is being followed one cannot disown it. The other thing is that all good values were followed universally even before the books were written.
Nowadays few psychologists have started to fear the so called holy books, which are being read by millions and millions. The reason they state is that, the most followed books give a slew of good wordings in between which they dictate people to perform cruelty, which have the power to influence more. We as better animals always try to defend something which we have followed for a long time and we try to find reasons that support what we think. It is embedded into our system by our native traditions to respect somebody who has given us the due respect, food and water, though we know it we try to rationalize books containing verses which have commanded human killing with bias and without thinking.
Moderate and innocent religious followers have rarely accepted the cruelty and slavery buried in these books. If the faults are pointed out to people, these innocent people will stand upon 10 verses, I would like to ask them, why should one read the full book? If so, other verses are unnecessary, follower of a book should follow the whole book. As moderates and innocents who have followed the native culture for long, will try to ignore the arrogance but it is still in the book that is being followed one cannot disown it. The other thing is that all good values were followed universally even before the books were written.
If god has created all of us, then he is not a
private property, anybody can speak about him and his books. He is for all good
human beings and good things and everybody has the right to speak about any
god.
Every object created by man in this earth is not by a single creator. Furthermore all the useful objects created by man in this world needed good co-creators to complete it. Please realize this, science provides insights to the wonders of this universe but that does not prove a specific creator. So never believe in books that uses scientific view of this universe to prove a book that had commanded human killing. Comparing zero and emptiness is like comparing a tree and an animal they are two different species altogether which is unacceptable.
Every object created by man in this earth is not by a single creator. Furthermore all the useful objects created by man in this world needed good co-creators to complete it. Please realize this, science provides insights to the wonders of this universe but that does not prove a specific creator. So never believe in books that uses scientific view of this universe to prove a book that had commanded human killing. Comparing zero and emptiness is like comparing a tree and an animal they are two different species altogether which is unacceptable.
All powerful god, should have personally surpassed the evil
without the use of humans or nature. Let the god directly
fight against the evil, like a father who fights for his child in the present
world against miscreants, then we can believe in these books. Since god answers
all our prayers, let us pray 5 times a day to the all merciful, all-knowing and
to the blessed son and the father, on Sundays with the co_union, so that we can
see a god whom we can see right in front of our eyes and fights against the
evil.
The so called God Came down to Mose after 400 years of slavery of
Isra_ites, now it has been at-least 1000 years, yet there is no
God sent savior, few of them are awaiting the second coming of
the savior, few say savior has already arrived which one is true?
probably none of them are true. May this Gods will save only the Isra_ites
or the ar_bs.
These venerated books give us Nov_H
ark details with units, along with that if God had given details about the
radius of the earth, area or empire size of India, Africa, Egypt, Jordan, North
America, South America, Sumeria, Babylon, Mesopotamia and Australia
or At least the area size of the first created Single
big continent, instead of just giving its names then one
can believe it was a worldwide book and not intended for selected
violent tribes.
Indian polytheists books can have different views,
interpretations with their books, but Ble and Qan or Kan should not because the
books are words inspired only by God alone, which is infallible and never
changing. Interpretations and words should have remained static, why
do they change? If interpretations have changed over years then they
are not words inspired by God.
The so called holy Books Change their names to Suit, cheat natives
of other culture, like Ble which name has been changed to Vetha_mam - is it Ble
or Veda? Names of books should never change but
this change in name shows on the false base to cheat native people.
To change the name from Ble and use words that sound and connects to the
natives of a land to propagate a religious fundamentalism in
itself shows the falsehood on which these books stand, all around the
world, names of books never change, but here see what this book has been called
? other example is the word ‘Kovil’ which is drastically different
from Ch_ch, why is there a need to call Cu_ch to be Kovil?
How and why should one use other countries native stories, just
teach what is present in the original books with the names that are given,
why do you change them? Do you know why these words were used at the onset?
These words were used to confuse people and make them forget their native
stories and make them corny capitalist salves. Here we would like
to appreciate Malay Gov which has taken a good stand to stop people
being confused.
The so called holy books use stories from less
read books of india, most of them from periyapuranam, since people haven't
known the whole play of Mahabarat, far less heard scenes from it has also been
copied in these two major books. Why to use musical instruments like veena,sitar, harmonium box, flute, carnatic music or bharathanatyam to propagate religious fundamentalism,
use things that were followed by the book writers alone, can they just follow
that? The irony of these Indians is that they won’t think beyond a century
and now they compare either with a small country or a country with small
population with vast area which has sufficient money by cheating
other subservient countries. The other thing is that most of the people
who degrade India have not explored their culture, their history, their
land properly and spread only the negative aspects of it. People blame about
people, if they are asked to change the attitude of those being blamed,
they will say it is not the responsibility of them. There is a saying that “
Both the cheater and cheated should be punished and both should take responsibility”.
The very act of stealing people's money in the name of social
service which is being done in most of the cults was started by the is_ites
then chr_ians, which is now being used almost all cult spiritual leaders around
the world. On the other hand the Is_am was for a group of ro_ers so there was
no need of cheating their own group.
The major difference between the books of Indian polytheists and other books is that their faith is not based only on books, they are ready accept the faults in their books,since they think that their books were written by human experience rather being words inspired by God alone. The most predominant saying in the Indian polytheists tradition is that, people can question God if they feel he is wrong, which cannot be done with Ble and Qan or Kan.
In essence the so called monotheistic tradition copy preach good
things which already which is in many context no different native traditions
with very few exceptions.Even though Indian polytheists have this leeway,
here in this blog we do not accept books which had violence.
All three books speak about prop_ets from initial onset, which might indicate that O’ test, N’ test and Qan or Kan, were written by ill hearted using things and information’s that already existed at the time, along with which they included their own crude ideas to control their tribes. Most of us accept that Lam was preached with Qan or Kan 610AD which makes Qan or Kan to be one of the young immature books.
All three books speak about prop_ets from initial onset, which might indicate that O’ test, N’ test and Qan or Kan, were written by ill hearted using things and information’s that already existed at the time, along with which they included their own crude ideas to control their tribes. Most of us accept that Lam was preached with Qan or Kan 610AD which makes Qan or Kan to be one of the young immature books.
Ble -
D_ut_omy – 18:20
20 “ ‘However, the pro_het
who presumes to speak in my
name a word that I have not
commanded
him to speakn or who
speaks in the name of other
gods,o that pro_het must
die.”
Above verse seems to be directly aimed at the Ppet - M, which
shows us the hatred of this books writer towards him and we can approximately
guess the time period during which this book would have been written, it should
be much later after 610 Ad, remember chapter D_ut_omy from Ble is one of the
O’est Chapter in O’ Test, which points out that the Ble can be the recent books
of all. Pro_het and saints are words which have never been used in indian tradition,
so this word ppet literally points to the founder of lam and this may be the
reason why the Ppet M was against the people of Scr_tures. The He_ew word for
Pro_het is נָבִיא (navi),
"spokesperson" -which can literally mean
anybody, which includes even the speakers in the Ble and Je Cht, to be plain
and straight nobody knows the actual meaning of (navi).
If one
wants to find the meaning of tetragrammaton, then the person has to search in
tamil because it is the only language in which almost all single letters had
meanings, those people from india were filled with humility, sincerity,
truthfulness, integrity, but now most of them are quite opposite.
Whatever may be the time
period the words should not vary in different versions, it
should remain the same. People who wanted to control moderates and
innocents monopolized god have changed many words like 'must' to 'shall',
'should' to 'can' which changes the meaning of the verse, what is the actual
word? Are the words just guessing?How can one
change 'must' to 'shall' if it is something inspired by god? If it
is unchanging words of higher authority, the words should not change. A
book inspired or given by God must not need citations
and Commentaries to explain its verses, anything which are words
should not need recompilation. But the people who wanted to control
innocent and moderates have changed and replaced the words. Even if it is
shall or must, any book that commanded human killing is flawed basically. All
powerful god can be anything and everything, so speaking of an external god
like these two books is immaterial and unwanted.
It has often been said that anything may be proved from Ble or Qan
or Kan but before anything can be admitted as proved by Ble or Qan or Kan, the
Ble and Qan or Kan must be proved to be original and true, literally one verse
should not contradict other verses of its own book.For If Ble and Qan or Kan be
unacceptable, not true, Contradictory the Truth of it be Doubtful, It ceases to
have authority and cannot be admitted as poof of anything.
These
books actually never have a worldwide view one can see this if one reads the
book carefully. Actually the fact is that these two most
revered books are not pro-slavery i.e., they are not against slavery but they
advocate it.
These books actually never have a worldwide view one can see this if one reads the book carefully.
Following are the translations without monopolizing interpretations, like in Kng Jam Ve or new versions of Qan or Kan. If one can find the unedited, initial literal translation of these books, maybe we should be able to find more cruel and brutal verses. Following are few verses which have missed the moderate, innocent and monopolization oriented eyes.
These books actually never have a worldwide view one can see this if one reads the book carefully.
Following are the translations without monopolizing interpretations, like in Kng Jam Ve or new versions of Qan or Kan. If one can find the unedited, initial literal translation of these books, maybe we should be able to find more cruel and brutal verses. Following are few verses which have missed the moderate, innocent and monopolization oriented eyes.
Ble:
Ble is a book that copied the most of the good ideas of others and
incorporated cruel verses to keep its tribe in control with fear and
aggression. Moreover during its book development these violent people moved
around the lands for water, food and wealth. People from this tribe are the
best in stealing others ideas, if they are unable to steal, they will buy the
idea, sell it, so that they always are the permanent owners.
I will gist three most recognizable people who have copied or
used others ideas to show themselves to be brilliant -
1.Patent Clerk - this guy wasn't called to be brilliant till he
entered Patent Office, now history will say differently.
2.Search - Copied From another prominent search during that period
3. Face - A freelance who stole others Idea.
After accumulating knowledge and information, they copied good information's into their new book. Once they copied most of the good things, instead of using aggression they started to use crouching tiger and a hidden dragon tactics. These are the guys whom we should fear the most. They will go to any extreme to control others and amass wealth to enjoy ownership on others.
After accumulating knowledge and information, they copied good information's into their new book. Once they copied most of the good things, instead of using aggression they started to use crouching tiger and a hidden dragon tactics. These are the guys whom we should fear the most. They will go to any extreme to control others and amass wealth to enjoy ownership on others.
The weapons that they use in their armory are
Initially
1. Sympathy – to get
donation, free help and unprecedented support.
2. Later Holy book – incorporate
ideas which were once used by other country natives to bring good, which are
now used by the stolen people to control innocent and moderate animal like us.
3. Donation – steal or
get money/wealth from native culture and give it back as if it was their money
and wealth.
Now
1. Create Jobs – to have workers, slaves and servants so that they are permanent owners as in Lv 25: 44-46, which has already been done without the knowledge among innocent and moderate followers.
2. Evangel_m – making natives to forget their past and use their own native people and native stories to make innocents as puppet servants.
3. Destroy agriculture and river – to make slaves, servants and workers to depend on their business so they can be big business owners
4. Unwanted Medical helps – Inject few unwanted vaccines to reduce human resources of other countries, spread unwanted viruses and create markets to steal natural resource from other countries.
5. Native tradition and culture have taught us to be sincere and show gratitude to the master who has respected us and taught us different good things, which is being used against us, so that few people of the tribe enjoy the goodness of this universe for free which is deserved for all good human beings and good things.
6. Fabricate Archaeological proofs and theories related to these holy books alone so that people believe in their book.
Ble
|
Questions/Verdict
|
||
I_ai_h - 45:7
I form light and create Darkness
I make peace and
create Calamity
I, God, am doing all these things.
|
He does it, not the evil
|
||
D_ut_omy 13:6-10
6.If your brother, the son of your
mother,
or your son or your daughter or your
cherished wife or your companion who
is like your own soul should try to
allure you in
secrecy, saying 'Let us go and serve
other gods,
whom you have not known, neither your
fathers
have known 7.from the gods of the
people all around you,
whether near you or those far away
from you,
from one end of the land to the other
end of the land,
8. you must not give in to him or listen
to him, nor should
you show pity or feel compassion or
protect him
9. Instead, you should kill him without fail. Your hand should
be the first to
come upon him to put him to death, and the
hand of all the people afterward. 10.
And you must stone
him to death
|
Just do it, you are the first? Only
better animals will do it, not even the animals.
|
||
Ma_ew 10:34-35; L_ke 12:51:53
34,Do
not think I came to put
peace upon the
earth; I came
to put, not peace,
but a sword.
35, For I came to
cause division,
with a man against his father,
and a daughter against her
mother, and a young wife against
her mother-in-law
|
Father is jealous
on his kids creates separation and makes them tribes, the revered son does
not like peace but fight on earth and division between family members.
|
||
D_ut_omy 13:20-21
20. and say to the elders of this
city, 'This son of ours is
stubborn and rebellious, and he
refuses to obey us. He is a
glutton and drunkard.21.Then all the
men of this city must
stone him to death.(for who live in
is-el)
|
Tell the lie to prove your point. Is
this statement correct even if it is only for is-el?
|
||
E_dus 21:24-25
24.Eye for eye, tooth for toot, hand
for hand, foot for foot
25 burn for burn, wound for wound,
blow for blow.
|
Can one do it to all?
|
||
D_ut_omy 16:12
The man who acts presumptuously by
not listening to the priest who is
ministering to your god or the judge
must die (for who live in is-el)
|
This is the point from where normal
and good priest started to dominate. All will say good things were copied
from this book why not say this was the starting point to corrupt all other
native priests?
|
||
Ps_lm 136:9
9.Happy will be the one who seizes
your children
and dashes them against the rocks.
|
Will you do it? Let us enjoy it that
what the father has said us to do.Whatever may be the rock size, commanding
humans to hit their kids with rocks is unacceptable by any standards.
|
||
Ge_is 11:6-7
6 "Look! They are one people
with one language and this is what
they have started to do. Now there is
nothing that they may have
in mind to do that will be impossible
for them. 7. Come! Let
us go down there and confuse their
language in order that they may
not understand one another's
language".
|
A normal father in as a better animal
living in earth, who is not a psychopath,he will not fear, he will not be
jealous, he will not confuse his kids, he would love his family and children
to be united and as one. But what has
this great father done? seems to be a psychopath.
|
||
Le_ti_us 25: 44-46
44 Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations
around you, from them you may
buy a male or female slave.
45.Also from the sons of the foreign
settlers who are residing with you
from them and from their families
that are born to them in
your land you may buy slaves, and
they will become your possession. 46. You may
pass them on as an
inheritance to your sons after you to
inherit as a
possession time indefinite. You may use them as workers.
|
We have to be an inherited
possession, be a slave to these writers; I
think we already are, most of the companies that we work are owned by them. They are either direct owners or
stakeholders or indirectly they are the investors.
Somebody who has truly suffered from slavery would have realized that slavery is horrible, unbearable, hurting and bad so they will not support slavery in anyway and would have not wanted any other better organized animal’s to be slaves. This is mere a better animals thought, then how should a true God’s thought should be? To command or to say others to have slaves in the name of God shows one’s true nature, intention and ideas to control or suppress other fellow better animals. |
||
1 Pe_er 2:18-25
18. Let house servants be in
subjection to their owners with
all due fear, not only to the good
and reasonable, but also to those hard to please.
19. For if someone, because of
conscience toward god, bears up under
grievous things and suffers unjustly
this is an agreeable thing.
20. For what merit is there in it if,
when you are sinning and
being slapped, you endure it? but if,
when you are doing good
and you suffer, you endure it, this
is a thing agreeable with god.
21.In fact, to this course you were
called, because even chr_st
suffered for you leaving you a model
for you to follow his steps
closely. 22.He committed no sin, nor
was deception found in his mouth.
|
By giving us an
example we are actually being asked to be slave and you should not question
your owner who possesses you? Who gave them the right to do so or say so?
|
||
E_dus 31:15
15. Six days work may be done, but on
the seventh day is a sabbath
of complete rest .It is something
holy to God.
Anyone doing work on sabbath day must
be put to death.
|
Hey it is a comm_ment right? So will
you put others to this punishment? Actually these books never say when the
week starts, how will you calculate the day then? If somebody says earth
creation took 1000 of years, how will you calculate sabbath? If it is 24 hrs
tell me the actual days when they were created and when he rested from this
wonderful book, should not use other sources.
|
||
Ma_ew 5:17-19
17. “Do not think I came to
destroy the Laws or the Prophets.
I came, not to destroy, but
to fulfill 18. for truly I say to
YOU that sooner would heaven
and earth pass away than for
one smallest letter or one particle
of a letter to pass away from
the Law by any means and not
all things take place. 19. Whoever,
therefore, breaks one of
these least commandments and
teaches mankind to that effect,
he will be called ‘least’ in relation
to the kingdom of the heavens.
|
Here the laws are no less important
from the comm_ments, one can infer from 1 Co_hians below, from which one can
say the whole ble is a law, one should follow the whole book without fail.
This guy never followed the comm_ment
of Sabbath, Then how can he say that? How does the law mean
cruc_fixion? if somebody relates cruc_fixion they should show the
verses that directly points to the relation between law and cruc_fixion,
then one can accept the law is about cru_fixion and not about
comm_ments.
Check Joh15:10;Joh10:35;2Ti3:16;Jam1:17; 1Ti 6:1, Mar 2:27,28, 1Joh2:3 before speaking |
||
Ma_ew 10:37
37 He that has greater affection for
father
or mother than for me
is not worthy of me; and he
that has greater affection for son
or daughter than for me is not
worthy of me.
|
If we love our
child then we are disowned by the merciful Son
|
||
1 Co_hians 14:34
34. Let the woman keep silent in
congregations,
for it is not permitted for them to speak,
Rather , let them
be in subjection, as the law also
says.
1 Ti_thy 1:12
12. I do not permit a woman to teach
or to exercise authority
over a man, but she is to remain
silent.
|
There is no women right in here, so
one can ask them to shut up if they speak?
|
||
Ma_ew 5:19 (Nt – revered Auth K-V
version)
Whosoeuer therfore shall breake one
of these least comm_ments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the
least in the kingdome of heauen: but whosoeuer shall doe, and teach them, the
same shall be called great in the kingdome of heauen.
|
This verse suggests me to follow all
the comm_ments ; All comm_ments from OT should be followed
|
||
Joh 10:25 (Nt – revered Auth K-V
version)
If hee called them gods, vnto whom
the word of God came, and the Scripture cannot be broken:
|
It reaffirms that the whole scripture
ie., both OT and NT needs to be followed.
|
||
Jam 1:17 (Nt – Auth K-V version)
Every good gift and every perfect
gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is
no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
|
Now it almost confirms that all the
words given in OT and NT should be followed
|
||
2 Ti 3:16 (Nt – revered
Auth K-V version)
All scripture is given by inspiration
of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness:
|
Now it is the fourth time one is
asked to follow OT and NT, means every word has to be followed
|
||
Pro_rbs 30:5 (OT - revered Auth
K-V version)
Every word of God is pure:
|
These are the few Purest tabulated
literal words of God
|
||
L_ke 19:27 (Nt – revered
Auth K-V version)
But those mine enemies, which would
not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.
|
He is not always a pacifist, he has
asked the reader to bring his enemy and kill, only animals and better animals
will do it, since it has been asked by someone else.
|
||
1 Pe_er 2:18-25 (Nt – revered
Auth K-V version)
18.Servants, be subject to your
masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the
froward.19.For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure
grief, suffering wrongfully.20.For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted
for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and
suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.21.For even
hereunto were ye called: because Ch_ist also suffered for us, leaving us an
example, that ye should follow his steps:22.Who did no sin, neither was guile
found in his mouth:23.Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he
suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth
righteously:24.Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree,
that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes
ye were healed.25.For ye were as sheep going astray; but are now returned
unto the She_erd and B_hop of your souls.
|
By giving us an
example we are actually being brainwashed to be slave and we should not
question our owner who possesses us? Who gave them the right to do so or say
so?
|
||
Eph_ans 6:5 1 Pe_er 2:18-25 (Nt –
revered Auth K-V version)
Servants, be obedient to them that
are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in
singleness of your heart, as unto Ch_ist;
|
Who is this giving rule to slaves?
Who should be the masters?
|
||
Uses planned tactics – Started
initially with battle donation of food and unwanted medical help
|
To make us disciplined organized
better animals
|
||
Qan or
Kan:
Qan or Kan was written to their ro'ery tribe. Now it is trying to
refine itself and take over the moderates and innocents. One of the followers
asked me how an illiterate get such vast knowledge? I asked him whether the
proprietor was deaf and dumb? He replied no, the next question that I put forward
was, what would have been his profession? He told me that he was a merchant.
Then I gave him the following answer, so your proprietor is a merchant, not
deaf or dumb then he should have acquired his knowledge in the market where
worldwide merchants gathered and interacting with other people and culture
around the earth which were much developed. Then using the acquired knowledge
he impressed his tribal group, then used his tribe to invade other countries
and looted its wealth.
Leader of this ro’ery group must have spoken verses of jad and he
commands respect of himself in the name of god so that his fighters would fight
for the sake of heaven. Sharing of looted wealth was to be done within the
ro’ers and that verses are not intended for outsiders of the thieves group, so
that the group remains intact and fights.
This book has went through many revisions, that's why people see a
transition of lam form rough to moderate to calm, this is how it might have
happened, they and their proprietor might have fought for water, food,
agricultural lands and wealth then after accomplishing the motives, if people
surrendered and gave money as tax or become servants and slaves then the ro’ery
tribe would have kept quiet, once settled in the occupied land they would have
acquired native virtues and adopt them into the book.
“Let there be no compulsion in religion” 2:256
"“Therefore expound openly what thou art commanded, and turn
away from those who join false gods with Alh” 15:94
Above verses seem to say clearly enough that the Qan or Kan
teaches a peaceful response to those who oppose lam.
But there are other verses in the Qan or Kan which say quite the
opposite. Which verse should one follow?
According
to the doctrine of abrogation, the later texts supersede the earlier whenever
there are inconsistencies, or they are said to “abrogate” the earlier texts.
Therefore, a follower simply needs to know which verse came earlier, and which
came later. The importance of
the doctrine of abrogation cannot be understated. Everything in the Qan
or Kan about forgiveness is abrogated by verse 9:5.
According to the doctrine of abrogation, these verses 2:256 and
15:94 are nullified and meaningless. They are contradicted by later
verses, and in lam it is the later verses which must be followed today.
Qan or Kan
|
Questions/Verdict
|
2:191 And fight them on until there is no more
tumult or oppression,
and there prevail justice and Faith
in Alh; but if they cease,
let there be no hostility except to
those who practice oppression
|
Direct commands;
will any better animal like us do it?
|
2:216 Fighting is prescribed
for you, and you dislike it.
But it is possible that you dislike a
thing which is good for you,
and that you love a thing which is
bad for you. But Alh knows, and you know not.
|
What? Is it prescribed?
|
4:89 They wish that you reject faith,
as they have rejected, and thus that you
all become equal. So take no friends
from them, till they
emigrate in the way of alh. But if
they turn back take hold of them
and kill
them whenever you find them, and take no friends.
|
Hurt others?
|
4:91 If they do not keep away from
you or offer you peace or withdraw
their hostilities, then seize them
and kill them wherever they are.
We give you complete authority over
them.
|
Shouldn’t I just leave them?
|
5:33 The recompense of those who wage
battle against alh and his
mess-ger and do mischief in the land
is only that they shall
be killed or
crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off.
|
Will you be Cruel?
|
8:12 (Remember) when your Lord
revealed to the angels,
"verily, i am with you so keep
firm those who have believed.
I will cast terror into the hearts of
those who have
disbelieved, so strike them over the
necks,
and smite over their fingers and toes
|
Will you hit them?
|
9:5 Then when the Sacred months have
passed then kill the pegans
whenever you find
them,
and capture them and besiege them, and lie in
wait for them in each and every
ambush. But if they pay you the tax
or money leave their way free.
|
If they become your slaves Keep
Quite.
|
9:14 Fight against them so that alh will punish them by
your hands and disgrace them
and give you victory over them.
|
Using me to punish?
|
9:29 Fight against those who believe not in alh nor in his
last day , nor forbid that which has
be forbidden by alh and his
mss_ger and those who not acknowledge
the religion of truth
among the people of scrip_ure, until they pay money or tax
with willing
submission and feel themselves subdued.
|
Money, money,
wealth
|
9:123 o you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are
close to you and let them find
harshness in you.
|
we will not do it
|
47:4 So, when you meet (in fight -
Jad in alh cause) those who disbelieve,
smite
(their) necks till
when you have killed and wounded many of them, then
bind a bond firmly
(on them, ie., take them as captives).
Thereafter (is the time) either for
generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom
(according to what benifits lam),
until the war
lays down its burden.Thus [you are
ordered by alh to continue
in carrying out jad against the
disbelievers till they embrace
lam and are saved from the punishment
in hell fire or at least
come under your protection], but if
it had been alh will, he himself could
certainly punished them (without
you). ut (he lets you fight) in order to test some of you with
others. But those who are killed in
the way of alh, he will never let their deeds be lost.
|
Is this necessary?
|
4:3 And if you fear that you
shall not be able to deal
justly with
orphan-girls then
marry (other) woman of you choice,
two or three, or four; but if you
fear that you shall not be able
to deal justly (with them), then only
one or (the slaves) that your right
hand possesses. That is nearer to
prevent you from doing injustice
|
Do this verse the urge is
uncontrollable? I do not think so.
|
4:34 Men are protectors and
maintainers of women because
alh has made
one of them excel the other ,
and because they spend from their means.
Therefore the righteous women are
devoutly obedient, and gaurd in the husband's
absence what alh orders them to
gaurd. As to those women on whose
part you see ill-conduct,
admonish, refuse to share their beds beat
them.
|
Women’s rights,
there is no male dominance.
|
Uses planned tactics – Started
initially with battle, just now donation of food and money
|
To make us unthinking organized
better animals
|
These verses have made me
think twice before i recommend these book to others.
The two holy books have digested many good things of different
native cultures and destroyed humanity by giving false interpretations of ble
and qan or kan and books that were followed by the natives. These two books ble
and qan or kan were left into countries to preach good things to people; they
have done it by making us animals into better animals, not a human being. Now
they are suppressing the actual culture of natives and spreading religious
barbarism.
Hin_ism:
Hin_ism has many books; they have many different claims, several
different interpretations, and timeline estimations. We haven’t included any
quotes since following questions in itself are the basic ones to be thought
about.
Questions
|
Views/Verdict
|
Mainly there are three different
views – Few claims that the books were word of god, while few others tell
they were revealed to them by god, on the other hand few claim books were
knowledge exchanged as legacy, finally few tell that words are insight of
self-realized people .
|
Which one should be considered? Is
this dilemma due to its oldness or manipulation?
|
We are often told by its
followers that they respect woman as Goddess, then Sati should have not been
practiced, why was it practiced?
|
Is this the way to treat a Goddess?
|
Most of the general public had an
intimate family relationship and they lived by the rule of one man one woman,
then why was God portrayed to have more than one woman? Why were few kings
allowed to have more than one woman?
|
Were the laws only for common people?
Why should others be spared if it is moral law?
|
Man_smri – This book has designated a
selected group just to work and it has asked the people to punish them if
there are mistakes
|
This is called dignified slavery.
|
Why was the sacred text, knowledge
preached to selected few?
|
What mistake did others do?
|
Atheism:
Most of the thoughts are just Indoctrination in the name of science.
Books have preached bad things let us accept that and discard those books and truly unite, realize the actual human potential, not to challenge nature but to be humans. We do not deny the fact that they have many good verses but these commanding bad verses make them the most unreliable and un-trustable books on this earth.
Most of the thoughts are just Indoctrination in the name of science.
Books have preached bad things let us accept that and discard those books and truly unite, realize the actual human potential, not to challenge nature but to be humans. We do not deny the fact that they have many good verses but these commanding bad verses make them the most unreliable and un-trustable books on this earth.
A true god is not a psychopath , he will surely
be happy for being united, he will not fear, he will not be jealous and
separate people as individual tribes like a true father in the human society
who loves his family to be good and united. Please
do not give me your reasoning, show me the reason in your holy book, which
should be convincing.
If an individual better animal tries to justify the the holy book realize that they are just innocent and moderate with deep down attachment to the true native culture, which has existed even before these books were written. Furthermore, if somebody justifies the violent verses on behalf of a fraternity using statements like verses were distorted by satan, corrupted by others invaders, remember that these same justification can be given by all books, which makes all books to be good, equal and depends on individual interpretation. Why should we believe in those books, try to prove those books, which are subject to one's interpretation? Once individuals start to realize these arrogant verses, leaders of these organized better animals who want to enjoy all the wealth and nature without much effort through donations given by us better organized animals, will do anything to prove these verses are wrong or either they will say these verses never existed. There are moderate and innocent better animals who just want to speak the opposite of what you tell or it is just means that they do not listen to what you speak or they want to show you they know more than what you know even without thinking that they do so.
If an individual better animal tries to justify the the holy book realize that they are just innocent and moderate with deep down attachment to the true native culture, which has existed even before these books were written. Furthermore, if somebody justifies the violent verses on behalf of a fraternity using statements like verses were distorted by satan, corrupted by others invaders, remember that these same justification can be given by all books, which makes all books to be good, equal and depends on individual interpretation. Why should we believe in those books, try to prove those books, which are subject to one's interpretation? Once individuals start to realize these arrogant verses, leaders of these organized better animals who want to enjoy all the wealth and nature without much effort through donations given by us better organized animals, will do anything to prove these verses are wrong or either they will say these verses never existed. There are moderate and innocent better animals who just want to speak the opposite of what you tell or it is just means that they do not listen to what you speak or they want to show you they know more than what you know even without thinking that they do so.
Most of the wars are fought trying to establish monopoly of god,
the other trick used to establish monopoly is donation, humanitarian help to
establish their agenda. If a person wants to do good things, one should do it
without any shade, if it is done with a
background motive like monopoly, eternal blessing or the reward for heaven,
then the help is of no use and it is mere selfishness.
One can believe in the external god claimed by Ble and Qan or Kan,
if some humans amputated leg or hand or head grows back without the help of
human intervention, at least let him make
the hair re-grow in every single bald headed man all around the world without
human findings, research and discovery, it should be done only using one
of the following ways - prayer, reading verses from the holy books, ble study,
mass prayer, sunday co_union, mass or five times of worship to the holy father,
holy son, holy spir_t or alh the all merciful and all knowing, for this reason
it can be any polytheist god like siv, vish, or braham, then we can
believe the external god, miracles, angel, heaven and hell preached by these
books. The Eternal blessings and heaven promised by these two books
are too futile and it is like investing in a fraudulent finance company, which
cheats all its investors, without any actual returns, unity between better
animals like us will not happen till these immaterial doctrines exist.
An age old tradition will speak about universal oneness for the sake
of whole humanity and will not ask people to fight about holy land or a god or
support a specific tribe. The so called ‘long
followed tradition or culture’ should have eradicated books that have directly
commanded human killing and which is not against slavery. There is no use of
boasting to be a tradition of 5000 years or 1400 years or 1 year, the tradition
which can boast is the one which did not command slavery and human killing for
the sake of god or land through books or believes.
One cannot deny the fact that these books have made us animals
into better creatures, now it is time for the better creatures to become humans
leaving the book behind. Let us be good and do good, being as a human and not
as a better animal following a book.
Humans will be good even without the constant observation or judgment of an external god and they do not expect blessings and rewards of eternity or heaven. True universal god will bless only those who are Human and not the adherent improvised and organized better animals following any holy book, religious belief, preaching, co_union, meetings, mass or five times worship.
Disclaimer: This blog is intended for open minded Better animals like us trying to become human and not for animals and better animals. This information is to open the thinking and not to hurt any individual. If you are hurt by reading any part of this blog, it is not our responsibility and it is unintentional, It has always been your choice to close the blog!
